First off, the sentence is similar to Fr Maciel' Vatican sentence in 2006 = after all the investigations and testimonies he is guilty but there are attenuating circumstances; let's give him a slap on the hand.
Secondly, if he is guilty he deserves a harsher sentence;
If he is not guilty he deserves to be free.
Seems that the message the justice system in Chile is giving us that:
- Fr. O'Reilly, it seems, is kind of guilty...not sure
- he is guilty = keep him away from children
- he is guilty, but maybe it was not all that bad...
- ---
- What about the child and her family:
- if they made it up why did they put their daughters through such distress
- If their daughters were really abused by Fr. O'Reilly, how distraught they must be; after all the money they spent(?)to try to get justice for their daughters.
- If the parents made it up, where did this hatred against Fr. O'Reilly spring from?
No comments:
Post a Comment